After the seminar: presentations available

During the seminar participants learned about the publishing process and the ways in which authors can influence the success of their publications. This seminar was especially designed for early career researchers and PhD candidates. Senior staff, students and support staff were also welcome to attend. 

The powerpoint presentations of the speakers can be looked at in the section The program. A link to the recordings of the seminar is added below.  A blogpost about the highlights of the seminar and choices the speakers made about their favourite world-class publications will be added shortly!

Recording before the break (Mervyn Bregonje, prof.dr. Huib Pols, drs. Carl Schwarz, prof.dr. Pearl Dykstra and dr. Arfan Ikram)
Recording after the break (prof.dr. Willem Schinkel and dr Thed van Leeuwen; discussion)

How to write and publish a word-class paper – tips & tricks

In our Seminar Carl Schwarz from Elsevier shared his do’s and don’ts regarding writing and publishing journal articles. You can download his powerpoint Publish a World-class Paper, Impact and Relevance and watch the presentation here (his presentation starts at 00.38.16).

Some attendants have indicated that they want more practical tips. In our library you can find a collection of practical books on writing, for example ‘Polishing your prose : how to turn first drafts into finished work’ and ‘The essential guide : research writing across the disciplines’. You can find more titles in this LibraryThing collection. The Medical Library has books focusing on medical writing.

polishing

essential

Elsevier is not the only publisher who shares tips & tricks. Here is a selection of links:

Sage Connection – tips for you – blog with tips about writing, publishing etc.
Springer: The Author Academy – short courses (less than 15 minutes) including writing a manuscript, the peer review process (and how to respond to peer review) and Open Access.
WileyExchanges for researchers and for authors – includes for example a post on how to make your article better findable for search engines like Google.

The language & Training Centre of the Erasmus University Rotterdam offers a course ‘Academic Writing in English for PhD students’, see http://www.eur.nl/english/ltc/employees/courses/english/acwr_phd/

Some pictures of the seminar!

You show me your world-class paper and I’ll show you mine …

druppel

In a distant past – two, three decades ago – researchers relied on publishers to market their publications and on university libraries to make sure colleagues and interested laymen would be able to find them.  In a sense then, publishers and libraries worked together to establish scholars’ personae.

Publishers and libraries still provide those services, of course. Increasingly, however, these are complemented by websites offering self service facilities to help researchers draw attention to their work, to follow the work of their colleagues, to participate in collegial networks and, in the process, to build a reputation.

researchgate academia

 

 

So, with your publications on offer at the journal’s website, with Open Access copies deposited in RePub, and with your Researcher ID registered with ORCID, your next step may well be to set up an account with one (or more) of the social networking sites specifically targeting academic researchers. These sites – of which ResearchGate and Academia.edu are probably the best known examples – do offer the possibility to upload or link to the full text files of your publications. You are also invited to provide information about yourself: about your expertise, your career history, your achievements, and also about your professional interests. Colleagues that share the same affiliation can also present themselves as a group. Naturally these sites advocate Open Access, because they cannot host full text documents that are subject to copyright restrictions.  However, the availability of publications, although an important feature, is not what distinguishes them from repositories, journal or publisher websites, or Google Scholar.

Networking for academics

What sets them apart is that their fabric is woven by the interaction between their registered members. Sharing your work, following the work of others, being kept up-to-date about their publications, discussing new research ideas, or simply exchanging collegial advice, are only a few of the available functionalities. As these sites evolve, it is not always easy to fathom the actual depth of the information available or the extent of the involvement of their members. Inevitably some participants are much more active than others. In addition, new sites will come along, inspired or challenged by the existing ones. Attractive and successful features will also find their way into the websites of major publishers like Elsevier, Thomson-Reuters, and Springer.

In other words: there is a real chance that in a few years time researchers will no longer be able to see the wood for the trees, wondering where to manage all their profiles and publication lists. Paradoxically then, it could well be that a good local Research Information System (RIS) combined with a good local repository of publications will turn out to be the best place to start building an international reputation.

These University Library services, already existing or under development, could then act as a hub to distribute information to networks of colleagues and peers.
Hm, there’s a thought …

Author: Hans Brandhorst

Are you ready to become a number?

numberIn an earlier post – May 19, 2014 – attention is paid to ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID). This is an author identifier you can use to claim your publications: such as articles in scholarly journals, for example found in international bibliographical databases like Scopus or Web of Science (WoS); and you can f.i. add the URL of your Google Scholar Profile.

But despite this ‘umbrella’ identifier it’s still useful to make sure that in all these separate databases your author name is correct and coupled with your publications.These profiles are created by certain algorithms and they can be wrong: there can be publications in your Scopus Author Profile or WoS author set that are not yours, you might have multiple Author Profiles or your publication is assigned to someone else. This means you always have to check them! A Google Scholar Citations Profile helps you to keep track of citations to your articles, based on Google Scholar. This includes the citing publications, and several citation metrics. The citation universe of Google Scholar is bigger than Web of Science or Scopus, which means you will have more citations! Always nice of course, but at the same time cause for a thorough check ….

In several faculties we have held – or will have – workshops to assist researchers in making authors identifiers or profiles and to couple these with their publications. If you want to know more about this service, please let us know.

See for more background information about researcher identification our Research Matters portal. There you can also find the most recent versions of  handouts on how to create your AuthorIDs and how to keep them up-to-date:

identifier

Handout ResearcherID (pdf) – Updated: June 4, 2014
Handout Scopus Author Profile (pdf) – Updated: June 4, 2014
Handout ORCID (pdf) – Updated: June 4, 2014
Handout Google Scholar Citation Profile (pdf) – Updated: June 4, 2014

 

The small picture has been taken from: Enserink, M. (2009). Scientific publishing. Are you ready to become a number? Science, 323(5922), 1662–4. doi:10.1126/science.323.5922.1662

RePub, the shop window for EUR research

Some numbers

In the past seven months researchers from all over the world downloaded 90 scientific articles and 228 dissertations written by researchers at the Erasmus University … and they did so every hour! They found these articles and dissertations, together with books and book chapters, working papers, research reports, conference contributions, inaugural lectures, etcetera, on the website of RePub, the institutional repository of the EUR. In total 2,299,893 PDF-files were downloaded between October 2013 and the end of May 2014, an average of 10,313 per day. So, without exaggeration, the University Library can claim that its RePub service efficiently plays its role as the shop window for the research done at the Erasmus University.

Still work to do

At present RePub contains some 38,000 publications – substantial but far from complete. Not every author remembers to deposit a copy of his or her manuscript in the RePub mailbox as soon as an article is accepted for publication. Many interesting publications are still waiting to be included in the repository. Fortunately, RePub’s use of the Google App Engine platform guarantees seamless scalability. So, even when it is complete, and then annually growing with an average of 4,000 publications, the repository can still easily serve a much greater audience. Unfortunately, not every publication in RePub can be downloaded by everyone. Even though 55% of its content qualifies as ‘Open Access’, which is a relatively high score, still 45% of articles and book chapters produced in Rotterdam cannot be made available free of charge to everyone who is interested.

A silent service

In other words: there is room for improvement. And everyone can help. Although the repository is a service provided by the University Library, every researcher can contribute and has an interest in doing so. Needless to say that doing good research and writing interesting articles are the primary and secondary concern of all research staff. However, making results visible and accessible to as large an audience as possible, is an important complementary concern for the whole institution. Just a single illustration, produced by RePub’s “report” function, is enough to demonstrate why. It shows that since the launch of the new version of RePub in October of last year 4,592 EUR dissertations were downloaded by 64,858 unique visitors (i.e. actual, real people …) from the US alone. Perhaps even more importantly: 39,165 visitors from India downloaded a total of 3,394 different dissertations produced in Rotterdam – for free. In a sense then, the University Library provides its own “Knowledge Dissemination Service” and it does so without making too much fuzz about it – a Rotterdam tradition.

dissertationdownloads

For information about Open Access and the EUR policy see Open Access, part of our Research Matters portal.

 

Author: Hans Brandhorst

Open Access

Open AccessEven though Open Access is a much, and sometimes hotly, debated issue in the world of universities, publishers and politics, it is a very simple concept. It rests on the idea that publicly funded institutions, such as universities, should make the published results of academic research available on the internet, free of charge. At present the majority of those results, journal articles, are sold by commercial publishers. As a rule authors are requested to transfer their copyright to the publishing companies before their articles can be published. It is common practice rather than a legal obligation to do so, but it is often complicated for authors to hold on to their rights. In the past decades the feeling that universities have to buy back what originally was theirs – in the form of journal subscriptions – has become stronger and stronger. Add to this that the costs of subscriptions continue to rise while library budgets continue to shrink, and it is only logical that the academic world is looking for a way out of a ‘toll-only’ system.

Green and Golden Road
So far, a solution is sought in two main directions: the so-called Green Road and Golden Road. Open Access in accordance with the Green Road means that, even if they agree to a transfer of copyright, authors keep the right to deposit their own version of an article in an institutional repository. Somewhat simplified, “their own version” can be the text as it was originally submitted for publication, or the text as it stands after the editorial and peer review processes have run their course. Usually the institutional repository is a website that is maintained by their university (library). Depositing the manuscript of an article in a repository is already allowed by some 80% of the journals involved.
The Golden Road solution means that authors, or more likely their institutions, pay the so-called Article Processing Costs (APC) to the publisher. In exchange they have complete freedom to distribute the articles as they see fit. APC’s can vary but as a rule-of-thumb it is safe to assume they will be between 1,000 and 2,000 US dollars – per article.
At present the Open Access world is hybrid as Open Access (both Golden and Green) can be a policy at the level of a publishing house, a journal and even an article.

The right to give away
It is good to realize that in both cases, the author and/or his employer only retain (or buy) the right to give away for free what they have produced – a right that is theirs to begin with. Also: by giving away what is theirs, universities do not reduce subscription costs, since they still need to buy access to the published results of research that was done in the rest of the world…

For more background information see also Open Access, part of our Research Matters portal. The EUR repository is RePub.

Author: Hans Brandhorst